Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 2, 2013
Pages: 201 - 209
Conference paper
See full issue

INTERNACIONALNI UNIVERZITET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
EKONOMSKI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
PRAVNI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
FAKULTET ZA MEDIJE I KOMUNIKACIJE TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU

u saradnji sa

MIT UNIVERZITET SKOPLJE, SJEVERNA MAKEDONIJA
VEVU, VELEUČILIŠTE LAVOSLAV RUZIČKA U VUKOVARU, HRVATSKA
VELEUČILIŠTE VIMAL, SISAK, HRVATSKA
CKKPI, TRAVNIK, BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA

organizuju

31. MEĐUNARODNU KONFERENCIJU

EKONOMSKE, PRAVNE I MEDIJSKE INTEGRACIJE BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE I ZEMALJA ZAPADNOG
BALKANA KAO KLJUČNI POKRETAČ EUROPSKIH VRIJEDNOSTI

12. – 13. decembar 2025. godine

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 39
PDF Downloads: 50
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 07.12.2013. >> Accepted: 13.12.2013. >> Published: 21.12.2013. Conference paper

INSTITUCIONALNA OGRANIČENJA EKONOMSKOG RASTA U DRŽAVAMA JUGOISTOČNE EVROPE / INSTITUTIONAL LIMITATIONS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH IN THE COUNTRIES OF SOUTH-EASTERN EUROPE (SEE)

By
Milica Delibašić
Milica Delibašić

University of Montenegro , Podgorica , Montenegro

Abstract

All of the SEE countries have their own peculiarities and specific development problems and priorities. But they also share major similarities that are reflecting on: a) longterm and inertial reproduction of development crisis, and b) conflict between formal and informal institutions as the main generator of economic and social crisis. The economic crisis seriously destabilizes social, political and economic environment in the transition countries of the SEE. Therefore, the anti-crisis measures should be given a priority in the future designing of development policy and economic growth. Through the lenses of social and political flexibility in some measures of macroeconomic policy, it is necessary to consider their dosage, introduction, implementation and the timely manner of the specific situations. This study discusses the institutional limitations of economic growth in the SEE countries. It starts with the basic hypothesis that economic growth and development in the SEE countries must be based on the convergence of two approaches: globalization approach (which includes adjusting the achievements and the common development goals of all economies, regardless of their development level) and civilization approach (which respects the national economic specifics and different development trajectories) and auxiliary hypothesis that all the SEE economies eventually must implement institutional pluralism as a universal mechanism of the institutional coordination.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.