INTERNACIONALNI UNIVERZITET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
SAOBRAĆAJNI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
EKOLOŠKI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
FAKULTET INFORMACIONIH TEHNOLOGIJA TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
FAKULTET POLITEHNIČKIH NAUKA TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
u saradnji sa
FAKULTETA ZA LOGISTIKO UNIVERZA V MARIBORU, SLOVENIJA
organizuju
33. MEĐUNARODNU KONFERENCIJU
"IZAZOVI NOVIH TEHNOLOGIJA U FUNKCIJI MOBILNOSTI I ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA"
15. - 16. maj 2026. godine
University of Montenegro , Podgorica , Montenegro
All of the SEE countries have their own peculiarities and specific development problems and priorities. But they also share major similarities that are reflecting on: a) longterm and inertial reproduction of development crisis, and b) conflict between formal and informal institutions as the main generator of economic and social crisis. The economic crisis seriously destabilizes social, political and economic environment in the transition countries of the SEE. Therefore, the anti-crisis measures should be given a priority in the future designing of development policy and economic growth. Through the lenses of social and political flexibility in some measures of macroeconomic policy, it is necessary to consider their dosage, introduction, implementation and the timely manner of the specific situations. This study discusses the institutional limitations of economic growth in the SEE countries. It starts with the basic hypothesis that economic growth and development in the SEE countries must be based on the convergence of two approaches: globalization approach (which includes adjusting the achievements and the common development goals of all economies, regardless of their development level) and civilization approach (which respects the national economic specifics and different development trajectories) and auxiliary hypothesis that all the SEE economies eventually must implement institutional pluralism as a universal mechanism of the institutional coordination.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.