Home Archive Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 11, Issue 2, 2023
Pages: 194 - 202
Review paper
See full issue
Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 5
PDF Downloads: 3
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 06.12.2023. >> Accepted: 13.12.2023. >> Published: 16.12.2023. Review paper

UTJECAJ PROCESA GLOBALIZACIJE NA TRŽIŠTE RADA REPUBLIKE HRVATSKE/ IMPACT OF THE GLOBALIZATION PROCESS ON THE LABOR MARKET OF THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA

By
Siniša Bilić ,
Siniša Bilić

International University of Travnik , Travnik , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Zvonimir Filipović ,
Zvonimir Filipović

Veleučilište „Lavoslav Ružička“ u Vukovaru, Županijska 50, Vukovar , Vukovar , Croatia

Muamer Mumunović
Muamer Mumunović

Internacionalni univerzitet Brčko Distrikt BiH, M. Malića i I. Džindića bb, Brčko Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

The paper analyzes the impact of globalization on the labor market, with a special focus on the labor market of the Republic of Croatia. The accession of the Republic of Croatia to the European Union will lead to gradual liberalization of the labor market, which is strongly reflected on the domestic labor market and completely changes the picture of supply and demand for labor. Changes in the labor market are becoming dynamic and constant, and it is increasingly difficult to respond to them. The work points to the need to monitor, analyze and understand changes in the labor market and their consequences, which are absolutely necessary for the creation of high-quality labor, social and general social policies, as well as education policies, as well as credible long-term sustainable business strategies, which would ensure a long-term balanced and prosperous future for as many workers and companies as possible in today's global environment

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.