Home Archive Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 11, Issue 1, 2023
Pages: 320 - 327
Conference paper
See full issue
Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 3
PDF Downloads: 4
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 20.05.2023. >> Accepted: 27.05.2023. >> Published: 09.06.2023. Conference paper

ИЗАЗОВИ ПОРЕСКЕ ПОЛИТИКЕ У ЗЕМЉАМА ЕВРОПСКЕ УНИЈЕ / CHALLENGES OF TAX POLICY IN THE COUNTRIES OF THE EUROPEAN UNION

By
Олгица Несторовић ,
Олгица Несторовић
Contact Олгица Несторовић

Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla , Belgrade , Serbia

Виолета Бабић ,
Виолета Бабић
Contact Виолета Бабић

Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla , Belgrade , Serbia

Вук Милетић
Вук Милетић
Contact Вук Милетић

The College of Academic Studies “Dositej” , Beograd , Serbia

Abstract

In this paper, the authors deal with the issue of the challenges of current tax policies in the  countries of the European Union (EU), as well as the impact of tax harmonization on their national  economies. Tax rates in each national economy should be in line with the elasticity of supply and demand.  If the differences between supply and demand are greater, the arguments against tax harmonization are  stronger, and vice versa. Existing tax rates by country are often inconsistent with the elasticity of supply  and demand, which can lead to various forms of inefficiency.In the last decades, tax harmonization has  been taking place in the EU, primarily VAT, in order to introduce a uniform tax rate at the EU level, which  further implies a reduction in tax competition. However, tax harmonization does not suit all countries  equally. Profits from tax harmonization are mainly in countries that are moving from high tax rates to low  tax rates. However, much depends on whether harmonization includes only income tax, consumption tax,  or both.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.