Home Archive Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 10, Issue 2, 2022
Pages: 134 - 144
Review paper
See full issue
Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 2
PDF Downloads: 2
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 03.12.2022. >> Accepted: 10.12.2022. >> Published: 16.12.2022. Review paper

PRETVARANJE PRAVA KORIŠĆENJA, UPRAVLJANJA I RASPOLAGANJA U PRAVO SVOJINE PRED ORGANIMA UPRAVE – NAJČEŠĆE NEDOUMICE U POSTUPKU / CONVERTING RIGHTS OF USE, MANAGEMENT AND DISPOSAL INTO PROPERTY RIGHTS AT ADMINISTRATIVE AUTHORITY - THE MOST COMMON DOUBTS IN THE PROCEDURE

By
Nedeljko Krajišnik ,
Nedeljko Krajišnik

Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla , Belgrade , Serbia

Dragan Golijanin
Dragan Golijanin

International University of Travnik , Travnik , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

In this paper, the author tried to point out the most common dilemmas or doubts that arise in the procedures carried out by administrative authority during the implementation of the procedures for converting other rights into property rights that are still registered in the public real estate records, although these institutes, as a type of right, ceased to exist. These doubts arise due to the insufficient legal definition of the procedure and rules of the procedure carried out by the administrative authority at the request of the interested party, because this procedure is defined in only four (or six) articles of the Law on real rights. It is this vagueness or insufficiently clear specification of the procedure and conditions for converting earlier rights on real estates into property rights, that lead to doubts during the implementation of these procedures and to different decisions and positions on the same issue, which of course only contributes to legal uncertainty. In this paper, some suggestions and the author's opinion are given as to how this problem could be solved, in order to ultimately obtain better solutions, and to obtain a uniform application of law in all individual cases.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.