Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 5, 2015
Pages: 47 - 56
Review paper
See full issue

INTERNACIONALNI UNIVERZITET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
SAOBRAĆAJNI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
EKOLOŠKI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
FAKULTET INFORMACIONIH TEHNOLOGIJA TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
FAKULTET POLITEHNIČKIH NAUKA TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU

u saradnji sa

FAKULTETA ZA LOGISTIKO UNIVERZA V MARIBORU, SLOVENIJA

organizuju

33. MEĐUNARODNU KONFERENCIJU

"IZAZOVI NOVIH TEHNOLOGIJA U FUNKCIJI MOBILNOSTI I ODRŽIVOG RAZVOJA"

15. - 16. maj 2026. godine

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 79
PDF Downloads: 136
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 07.12.2015. >> Accepted: 13.12.2015. >> Published: 19.12.2015. Review paper

KVAZI-NEOLIBERALNA I MATEMATIČKA MODELIRANJA, PARADOKSI I EKSPERIMENTI/ QUASI-NEOLIBERAL AND MATHEMATICAL MODELING, PARADOXESAND EXPERIMENTS

By
Mimo Drašković ,
Mimo Drašković
Veselin Drašković ,
Veselin Drašković
Slobodan Lakić
Slobodan Lakić
Abstract

Quasi-neoliberal rhetoric in some transitional countries is predominantly of apologetic and interest character. Unfortunately, it represents not only an "extended hand" of alternative institutions, but also an anti-development basis of official economic policy. It is one of the proven ideological methods for ignoring and submission the formal and informal institutions.This paper criticizes the imposed, dominant and selective theoretical modelings of economic reality, which are of monistic (quasi-neoliberal) and mathematical-statistical character. We describe them as a deliberate transition from analysis and explanation of fundamental economic problems towards secondary issues. Therefore, we characterize them as a programmed models to dim the essence of the main problems of economic reality. We start from the hypothesis that the aforesaid modelings have replaced and virtually eliminated former synthesized and useful political-economic analysis. In conclusion, we note the need
for greater affirmation of political economy, which, combined with neo-institutional theories, could provide a much more realistic view of social and economic reality

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.