Home Proceedings Contact
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 6, 2016
Pages: 75 - 83
Research paper
See full issue

INTERNACIONALNI UNIVERZITET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
EKONOMSKI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
PRAVNI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
FAKULTET ZA MEDIJE I KOMUNIKACIJE TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU

u saradnji sa

MIT UNIVERZITET SKOPLJE, SJEVERNA MAKEDONIJA
VEVU, VELEUČILIŠTE LAVOSLAV RUZIČKA U VUKOVARU, HRVATSKA
VELEUČILIŠTE VIMAL, SISAK, HRVATSKA
CKKPI, TRAVNIK, BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA

organizuju

31. MEĐUNARODNU KONFERENCIJU

EKONOMSKE, PRAVNE I MEDIJSKE INTEGRACIJE BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE I ZEMALJA ZAPADNOG
BALKANA KAO KLJUČNI POKRETAČ EUROPSKIH VRIJEDNOSTI

12. – 13. decembar 2025. godine

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 3
PDF Downloads: 3
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 12.05.2016. >> Accepted: 12.12.2016. >> Published: 12.12.2016. Research paper

NORMATIVNI OKVIRI KORPORATIVNE BEZBEDNOSTI U REPUBLICI SRBIJI: AKTUELNO STANJE I PERSPEKTIVE RAZVOJA/ NORMATIVE FRAMEWORK CORPORATE SECURITY IN SERBIA: CURRENT SITUATION AND PROSPECTS FOR DEVELOPMENT

By
Milan Milošević
Milan Milošević

Univerzitet Union Nikola Tesla , Belgrade , Serbia

Abstract

It is indisputable that the optimization of normative regulation of corporate security significantly contributes to the development of a market economy, but also the realization of security and democracy in society as a whole. This is especially true in the field of normative regulation of private security as an essential segment of corporate security. It is also known that the Republic of Serbia in the long run was the only country in the Western Balkans and the wider, which the field of private security is not formally regulated by law. The adoption of the Law on private security in 2013 was the first, and most important step in overcoming the aforementioned situation, which existed for two decades. Meanwhile, in this area and adopted a series of bylaws, but are still disputed their scope. It is unclear, namely, whether the current legal regulation really improved standards for the protection of persons and property, that the holders of private security in practice encourage the professionalization and specialization of personnel, and the standardization and modernization of means and equipment

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.