Home
PDF download
Cite article
Share options
Informations, rights and permissions
Issue image
Vol 5, 2015
Pages: 352 - 359
Conference paper
See full issue

INTERNACIONALNI UNIVERZITET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
EKONOMSKI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
PRAVNI FAKULTET TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU
FAKULTET ZA MEDIJE I KOMUNIKACIJE TRAVNIK U TRAVNIKU

u saradnji sa

MIT UNIVERZITET SKOPLJE, SJEVERNA MAKEDONIJA
VEVU, VELEUČILIŠTE LAVOSLAV RUZIČKA U VUKOVARU, HRVATSKA
VELEUČILIŠTE VIMAL, SISAK, HRVATSKA
CKKPI, TRAVNIK, BOSNA I HERCEGOVINA

organizuju

31. MEĐUNARODNU KONFERENCIJU

EKONOMSKE, PRAVNE I MEDIJSKE INTEGRACIJE BOSNE I HERCEGOVINE I ZEMALJA ZAPADNOG
BALKANA KAO KLJUČNI POKRETAČ EUROPSKIH VRIJEDNOSTI

12. – 13. decembar 2025. godine

Metrics and citations
Abstract views: 15
PDF Downloads: 46
Google scholar: See link
Article content
  1. Abstract
  2. Disclaimer
Received: 17.04.2015. >> Accepted: 30.04.2015. >> Published: 22.05.2015. Conference paper

INSTITUCIONALNA SUŠTINA KONFLIKTA IZMEĐU EKONOMIJE I EKOLOGIJE / INSTITUTIONAL ESSENCE OF THE CONFLICT BETWEEN ECONOMY AND ECOLOGY

By
Milica Delibašić
Milica Delibašić

International University of Travnik , Travnik , Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Ecology and economy are increasingly intertwined in the local, regional, national and global level. The paper explains an institutional essence of the conflict that has long existed between the economy and ecology in the context of the need for much better protection of the environment. In the economic literature it is interpreted as a fundamental contradiction of economic reality. In order to meet the Pareto optimum in resolving conflict between economy and ecology, it is necessary to verify two hypotheses in practice: First, institutional arrangements should be urgently and consistently implemented, and second, the current formula of economic development should be expanded with another member - sustainable development, which also, consequently and necessary, should be based on institutional grounds.

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.